Prep Baseball Report

Utah Rising Stars ID: Pitching Data Dive


Cam Black-Araujo
Utah Operations

On Wednesday, May 29th, the Prep Baseball Utah staff hosted the Utah Rising Stars ID at Skyline High School in Salt Lake City, Utah. This event featured roughly 17 prospects from the 2028 - 2029 classes and allowed our staff an opportunity to get an in-depth look at the players in attendance as the majority of the players at the event prepare to join the high school ranks in the next several months.

Earlier this week, we broke down the top measurable data performers from the event with our Statistical Analysis. Now, we will take a further in-depth look at the top pitchers with the help of our tech partnerships, broken down by the categories down below:

For complete event results, click here.
To view upcoming event schedule, click here.

FASTBALL

MAX VELOCITY (MPH)

Rank Name State School Class Pos Velocity (max)
1 Cruz Adams UT Timpanogos 2028 SS 80.5 mph
2 Kash Sissener UT Parowan High 2028 RHP 79.2 mph
3 Tilden Scott UT Spanish Fork High 2028 1B 75.1 mph
4 Asher Williams UT Desert Hills 2029 SS 73.6 mph
5 Jett Pratt UT Tooele High 2028 OF 73.6 mph

Max Fastball Velocity: This metric calculates the speed of the pitch as it’s released from the pitcher’s hand.

SPIN RATE (AVG)

Rank Name State School Class Pos Spin Rate (avg)
1 Cruz Adams UT Timpanogos 2028 SS 2386 rpm
2 Kash Sissener UT Parowan High 2028 RHP 2136 rpm
3 Porter Eddington UT Maple Mountain High 2028 RHP 1940 rpm
4 Tilden Scott UT Spanish Fork High 2028 1B 1917 rpm
5 Jamon Yates UT American Fork 2028 RHP 1866 rpm

Spin Rate: This metric calculates the rate of spin on the baseball as it leaves the pitcher’s hand, measured in revolutions per minute (rpm). Historical data shows that high-spin fastballs lessen the impact of gravity, allowing for more ‘rise’ (or less fall, in other words) as it carries through the zone. Low-spin fastballs typically indicate the pitch has greater horizontal action, often making it tougher to square up, but generally easier to make contact with, leading to more ground balls, while high-spin fastballs show a correlation with swings and misses.

INDUCED VERTICAL BREAK (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos IVB (avg)
1 Asher Williams UT Desert Hills 2029 SS 12.9 in
2 Porter Eddington UT Maple Mountain High 2028 RHP 11.1 in
3 Nixon Ashby UT Mountain Ridge 2029 RHP 10.9 in
4 Kash Sissener UT Parowan High 2028 RHP 10.4 in
5 Tilden Scott UT Spanish Fork High 2028 1B 10.2 in

Induced Vertical Break: Used in short form as "IVB," this metric is most important on fastballs for creating rise and on curveballs for creating depth – it can also have some use when measuring sliders and cutters as well. Sliders tend to be closer to zero inches while cutters are generally between 5 and 15 inches. Usually fastballs and curveballs with large IVB have higher spin efficiencies as well. Sliders generally have very little (closer to zero) IVB and very low spin efficiency. You could also categorize IVB into spin rate as this is part of the “useful movement” you’re looking for. IVB is also a huge part of the vertical approach angle.

HORIZONTAL MOVEMENT (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos HM (avg)
1 Jamon Yates UT American Fork 2028 RHP 13.1
2 Cruz Adams UT Timpanogos 2028 SS 11.4
3 Tilden Scott UT Spanish Fork High 2028 1B -10.4
4 Asher Williams UT Desert Hills 2029 SS 8.3
5 Nixon Ashby UT Mountain Ridge 2029 RHP 8.3

Horizontal Break: Outlined on TrackMan’s own website: “... horizontal movement is measured in inches between where the pitch actually crosses the front of home plate side-wise, and where it would have crossed home plate side-wise if had it traveled in a perfectly straight line from release. A positive number means the break was to the right from the pitcher’s perspective, while a negative number means the break was to the left from the pitcher’s perspective.”

CURVEBALL

SPIN RATE (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos Spin Rate (avg)
1 Cruz Adams UT Timpanogos 2028 SS 2319 rpm
2 Jett Pratt UT Tooele High 2028 OF 2118 rpm
3 Porter Eddington UT Maple Mountain High 2028 RHP 2048 rpm
4 Asher Williams UT Desert Hills 2029 SS 1960 rpm
5 Tilden Scott UT Spanish Fork High 2028 1B 1783 rpm

INDUCED VERTICAL BREAK (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos IVB (avg)
1 Kash Sissener UT Parowan High 2028 RHP -6.0 in
2 Asher Williams UT Desert Hills 2029 SS -4.9 in
3 Porter Eddington UT Maple Mountain High 2028 RHP -4.8 in
4 Jett Pratt UT Tooele High 2028 OF -3.4 in
5 Tilden Scott UT Spanish Fork High 2028 1B 2.2 in

HORIZONTAL MOVEMENT (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos HM (avg)
1 Cruz Adams UT Timpanogos 2028 SS -15.1
2 Porter Eddington UT Maple Mountain High 2028 RHP -13.3
3 Jett Pratt UT Tooele High 2028 OF -13.0
4 Nixon Ashby UT Mountain Ridge 2029 RHP -6.3
5 Tilden Scott UT Spanish Fork High 2028 1B 3.6

SLIDER

VELOCITY (MAX)

Rank Name State School Class Pos Velocity (max)
1 Asher Williams UT Desert Hills 2029 SS 66.2 mph
2 Jamon Yates UT American Fork 2028 RHP 60.5 mph

SPIN RATE (AVG)

Rank Name State School Class Pos Spin Rate (avg)
1 Jamon Yates UT American Fork 2028 RHP 2141
2 Asher Williams UT Desert Hills 2029 SS 1901

CHANGEUP

HORIZONTAL MOVEMENT (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos HM (avg)
1 Cruz Adams UT Timpanogos 2028 SS 4.9
2 Porter Eddington UT Maple Mountain High 2028 RHP 4.1
3 Nixon Ashby UT Mountain Ridge 2029 RHP -3.6
4 Jett Pratt UT Tooele High 2028 OF 2.6

UPCOMING EVENTS

SHOWCASE STATE DATE LOCATION
2024 ProCase - West UT 06/02 Pepperdine University
2024 Scout Day: Rawlings Tigers UT 06/27 Skyline High School (Salt Lake City, Utah)
2024 Scout Day: CBA Utah UT 07/02 Pine View High School (St. George, Utah)
2024 Top Prospect Games (Invite-Only) UT 07/08 Cate Field (Salt Lake CC)
Future Games (Class of 2026/27) NATIONAL 07/24 LakePoint Sports
Junior Future Games (Class of 2028/29) NATIONAL 07/24 LakePoint Sports
Senior Future Games (Class of 2025) NATIONAL 07/24 LakePoint Sports

RELATED CONTENT